This is a sample report
Illustrative feedback on a made-up Biology investigation — this is what Wenzify gives you for your own IA.
The effect of temperature on the activity of catalase in potato tissue
A sound investigation with good biological control, but the sample size is small, uncertainties are thin, and the conclusion isn't yet tied to enzyme theory with evidence. (Science estimates are the least reliable, so treat this as a wide guide.)
~2700 words · Up to 3,000 words. Charts, tables, equations, citations and the bibliography don't count.Estimated
11–15
out of 24
DecentDraft history
How this commentary developed, draft by draft — a record you can show your teacher.
Focus on these first
The highest-impact changes, in order.
Replicate and show uncertainty
Repeat each temperature at least three times and add error bars from the spread so the trend is reliable.
Design & data analysis (Criteria A, B)
Tie the conclusion to enzyme theory
Explain the slowdown above the optimum as denaturation, and compare your optimum with a published value.
Conclusion (Criterion C)
Make the evaluation specific
Replace generic weaknesses with specific ones ranked by their impact on the rate.
Evaluation (Criterion D)
Comments on your text
Click a highlighted passage to see its comment.
Criterion breakdown
Criterion A
Research design
4 / 6
How to improve
- Increase to at least three replicates per temperature
- Justify the temperature range chosen
To reach 5/6
Add replicates at each temperature and justify the range, so the design supports a reliable trend.
Criterion B
Data analysis
3 / 6
How to improve
- Use replicate spread to add error bars
- State the uncertainty of the gas syringe and carry it into the rate
To reach 4/6
Collect replicates, add error bars from their spread, and propagate apparatus uncertainties into the rate.
Tables, graphs and figures
Image 1 · Line graph of rate vs temperature
Figure 1 — Rate of oxygen production against temperature
Processed data section
- Add error bars from replicate spread
- Link the drop after the optimum to enzyme denaturation in the text
Criterion C
Conclusion
2 / 6
How to improve
- Explain the drop in terms of denaturation of the active site
- Compare the optimum with a published value
To reach 3/6
Justify the optimum through enzyme theory (denaturation) and compare it with published data.
Criterion D
Evaluation
2 / 6
How to improve
- Make the weaknesses specific and rank them by impact
- Propose a realistic fix for the dominant error
To reach 3/6
Describe specific weaknesses, explain their relative impact on the rate, and give targeted improvements.
What's already working
- Good control of biological variables
- A valid measure of enzyme activity
- A clear optimum identified from the data
- A reproducible method