This is a sample report
Illustrative feedback on a made-up Business Management research — this is what Wenzify gives you for your own IA.
To what extent should Ryanair pursue a cost leadership strategy to maintain its competitive advantage in the European short-haul market?
A well-organised project with a relevant key concept and appropriate tools, built on a solid set of supporting documents. The marks are held back by analysis that lists its tools more than it reasons with them, and a conclusion that introduces a recommendation the body hasn't fully justified.
~1780 words · Up to 1,800 words. Supporting documents and references are not counted.Estimated
16–19
out of 25
DecentDraft history
How this commentary developed, draft by draft — a record you can show your teacher.
1 Sept 2026
~1780 words
0/3 checklist done
Focus on these first
The highest-impact changes, in order.
Reason with your tools, don't just present them
Let the findings of SWOT and Porter drive the analysis, and connect the tools to each other instead of describing each in turn.
Tools & analysis (Criteria C, D)
Make the conclusion follow from the body
Build up every recommendation in the analysis first, so nothing new appears at the end.
Conclusions (Criterion E)
Carry the key concept through
Use 'change' as a lens across the analysis and conclusion, not only in the introduction.
Key concept (Criterion A)
Comments on your text
Click a highlighted passage to see its comment.
Criterion breakdown
Criterion A
Integration of a key concept
3 / 5
How to improve
- Return to the concept of change in the analysis and conclusion, not just the introduction
- Use it as a lens to interpret your tools
To reach 4/5
Weave the key concept of change through the analysis and conclusion so it frames your judgement, rather than sitting mainly in the introduction.
Criterion B
Supporting documents
3 / 4
How to improve
- Replace the secondary summary with a primary source
- Reference each document where it informs the analysis
To reach 4/4
Use three to five varied, primary and current supporting documents, and refer to each explicitly where it informs your analysis.
Criterion C
Selection and application of tools and theories
3 / 4
How to improve
- Use the tools' findings to drive the argument, not just present them
- Integrate the tools with each other
To reach 4/4
Apply the tools analytically — let their findings generate the argument — and connect them rather than presenting each in isolation.
Criterion D
Analysis and evaluation
3 / 5
How to improve
- Develop each chain of reasoning fully
- Support each judgement with evidence from your documents
To reach 4/5
Develop balanced, well-supported analysis that uses your evidence to justify each evaluative judgement rather than asserting it.
Criterion E
Conclusions
2 / 3
How to improve
- Make sure every recommendation follows from the analysis above
To reach 3/3
Ensure each conclusion and recommendation is drawn from the analysis, with nothing new introduced at the end.
Criterion F
Structure
2 / 2
How to improve
- Keep this structure in the final draft
Criterion G
Presentation
2 / 2
How to improve
- Keep citations consistent throughout
What's already working
- A relevant key concept, clearly justified
- Appropriate business tools applied to the real company
- A solid, varied set of supporting documents
- A logical structure and clear presentation