This is a sample report

Illustrative feedback on a made-up Global Politics engagement project — this is what Wenzify gives you for your own IA.

Get feedback on your IA
Global PoliticsGlobal Politics Engagement ProjectSL

Local responses to housing inequality in my city

A genuine engagement linked to a clear political issue and relevant concepts, but the analysis leans on description of the experience and doesn't yet connect the local case to the wider political theory in a sustained way.

~1970 words · About 2,000 words (SL/HL common report). References are not counted.

Estimated

15–19

out of 24

Decent
AI estimate — not an official IB grade.

Draft history

How this commentary developed, draft by draft — a record you can show your teacher.

Draft 1

20 Aug 2026

12/24
A 2/4B 2/3C 4/8D 2/6E 2/3

~1850 words

3/3 checklist done

15/24+3
A 2→3/4B 2/3C 4→5/8D 2→3/6E 2/3

~1970 words

0/3 checklist done

Focus on these first

The highest-impact changes, in order.

1

Analyse through the concepts

Use power and inequality to interpret your engagement, and connect the local case to wider political theory.

Analysis and synthesis (Criterion C)

2

Weigh multiple perspectives

Evaluate the landlords' and council's views alongside the tenants', and the limits of a single engagement.

Evaluation and reflection (Criterion D)

3

Reflect on the process

Show how the engagement process itself shaped your understanding.

Process (Criterion B)

Comments on your text

Working wellProblemSuggestion

Click a highlighted passage to see its comment.

This engagement project explores local responses to housing inequality in my city. I volunteered with a local tenants' union to understand responses to rising rents1. Over six weeks I attended meetings and helped organise a petition. The union used collective bargaining power to pressure landlords, which links to the concept of power2. Seeing the issue from the tenants' side changed how I understood the housing debate3.

Criterion breakdown

Criterion A

Explanation and justification

3 / 4

GoodMedium confidence

How to improve

  • Justify why this engagement was the best way to explore the issue

To reach 4/4

Justify your choice of engagement explicitly as the most appropriate way to explore the issue.

Criterion B

Process

2 / 3

DecentMedium confidence

How to improve

  • Reflect on how the process itself shaped your understanding

To reach 3/3

Show how the engagement process influenced your understanding, not just what you did.

Criterion C

Analysis and synthesis

5 / 8

DecentMedium confidence

How to improve

  • Analyse the experience through the concepts rather than describing events
  • Connect the local case to wider theories of power and inequality

To reach 6/8

Sustain analysis that uses the concepts to interpret your engagement and links the local case to wider political theory.

Criterion D

Evaluation and reflection

3 / 6

DecentMedium confidence

How to improve

  • Weigh other stakeholders' perspectives (landlords, the council)
  • Evaluate the limitations of a single local engagement

To reach 4/6

Evaluate multiple perspectives and the limits of your engagement, drawing a reasoned reflection from them.

Criterion E

Communication

2 / 3

DecentHigh confidence

How to improve

  • Define key terms (e.g. 'collective bargaining') on first use

To reach 3/3

Communicate with consistently precise political terminology, defined on first use.

What's already working

  • A genuine engagement tied to a clear political issue
  • Relevant political concepts identified
  • Honest personal reflection
  • A clear, well-structured report

Revision Checklist

0 / 3 done