This is a sample report

Illustrative feedback on a made-up TOK essay — this is what Wenzify gives you for your own essay.

Get feedback on your IA
Theory of KnowledgeTOK Essay

To what extent is certainty attainable in mathematics and in the human sciences?

A clearly argued essay that contrasts two areas of knowledge with relevant examples and a consistent thesis. To move up, the examples need to answer the knowledge questions rather than illustrate them, and the counterclaims need developing so the essay evaluates rather than describes.

~1540 words · Maximum 1,600 words; examiners stop reading at the limit.

Estimated

5–7

out of 10

Decent
AI estimate — not an official IB grade.

Draft history

How this commentary developed, draft by draft — a record you can show your teacher.

Draft 1

20 Aug 2026

5/10
A 5/10

~1480 words

3/3 checklist done

6/10+1
A 5→6/10

~1540 words

0/3 checklist done

Focus on these first

The highest-impact changes, in order.

1

Answer knowledge questions, don't illustrate points

Turn each example into evidence for a claim about how an area of knowledge justifies (un)certainty.

Exploration of the title (Criterion A)

2

Develop counterclaims

For each claim, build the strongest counterclaim so the essay evaluates rather than describes.

Exploration of the title (Criterion A)

3

Return to the title

End each section by linking the discussion back to the prescribed title.

Exploration of the title (Criterion A)

Comments on your text

Working wellProblemSuggestion

Click a highlighted passage to see its comment.

This essay explores to what extent certainty is attainable in mathematics and in the human sciences. In mathematics, a proof establishes certainty in a way that is impossible in the human sciences1. For example, the Pythagorean theorem can be proved deductively and holds in every case2. In economics, by contrast, models rely on assumptions about human behaviour that do not always hold3. This suggests that the certainty of knowledge depends on the methods each area of knowledge uses to justify its claims.

Criterion breakdown

Criterion A

Exploration of the prescribed title

6 / 10

DecentMedium confidence

How to improve

  • Use each example to answer a knowledge question, not just to illustrate a point
  • Develop counterclaims so the essay evaluates rather than describes
  • Return to the prescribed title at the end of each section

To reach 7/10

Evaluate the knowledge questions each area of knowledge raises, develop counterclaims, and keep every example tied back to the prescribed title.

What's already working

  • Two areas of knowledge explored
  • Relevant, specific examples
  • A clear, consistent thesis
  • A logical structure within the word limit

Revision Checklist

0 / 3 done